A Precedent is What You Make It


Thankfully, the Post Office scandal has not yet been consigned to yesterday's news and buried under the mountain of crap that seems to get larger with each passing day. There appears to be some conflict, however between the government - who for once seem to want to actually do something about something in a vaguely timely fashion, for once - by expediting, en bloc, the exoneration of wrongfully accused and/or fined/incarcerated sub-postmasters in summary fashion. Well, good, is all I can say, as the whole sorry affair has been dragged out under a cloud of lies and legal obfuscation for far, far too long. Some ministers and the judiciary have apparently been quailing at the thought of the ability of a government to overturn decisions by judges, stating that it would set an unnerving precedent for the future.

Again, I agree with that countervailing view also: the implications are plain to see, and God knows, we can see the effects of governmental autonomy over justice throughout the world, and it ain't pretty, to say the least. However, as the evidence thrown up over this particular scandal has shown thus far, the decisions made in UK courts of law against these victims of corporate crime were based on perjury - the evidence before the courts was false in the first place. It shouldn't really take too much effort to reverse the situation without permanently endangering our legal system: those who are still left, and the families of those who didn't survive the scandal, need justice now, and the country and its legal system is big enough and robust enough to just get on with it, and pick the bones out of the niceties of precedent later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Feedback & Wobbles

A Time of Connection

Sister Ray