Freedom of the Press?

 

I can't keep up with UK politicking at the moment. Every day, some fresh scandal or other seems to surface from the Mother of Parliaments: scurrilous sexist and classist 'news' now followed by Doris defending the freedom of the press and the right of the paper in question's refusing to acquiesce to the Speaker's call to interview - as an ex - 'journalist' whose style and content also tended to the scurrilous and often juvenile in nature, I'm sure he would like to keep things 'free'. But the issue with the Rayner case was much more of intent, and to be honest, journalistic quality.

The fact that a national newspaper ran an article written by its political editor as shallow and frankly puerile as that was, frankly should open that organ up to scrutiny, as well as its sources. These papers are comics masquerading as newspapers: both the person who offered the 'story' to the paper and the highly-placed 'journalist' who hacked out this piece of junk need to look hard in the mirror and ask themselves exactly who they think they are and what they represent.

And just today we've had a report of a Tory MP caught watching porn in the Chamber. Just leave it till you're not working, eh? There's an awful lot that needs sorting out here in the real world by the people we've elected to represent us in Parliament and Government: what we don't need are Prime Ministerial apologias for 'freedoms' that are anything but.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Feedback & Wobbles

A Time of Connection

Sister Ray